Wednesday, November 08, 2006

The Diebold Dean "Victory"



When Al Gore finally conceded the 2000 election, he went silent and deadly. Seeing that punch cards were on their way out, he initiated a black box operation to steal touch screen elections. It took six years, but working with internet savvy Howard Dean, the criminals have stolen their first of many.

First there are the touch screens with no paper trail, in thirteen states. These are the easiest. Once the ballot is finalized, a simple IF statement is placed just before the ballot is recorded. Republican quietly becomes Dem. Doug Chapin, Director of Electionline.org tried to bring this to light, but his silence has been bought at a hefty price.

David Dill, founder of verifiedvoting.org found many machines with unsecured wireless connections. Deaniacs with laptops and PDAs went right to the databases, bypassing the computer code and changing only the totals themselves. Gore’s deep pockets “found” some incriminating “evidence” against Dill. His story will never get out.

Feeble attempts to close the wireless hole were easily overcome. When an election worker disables the wireless adapter, a simple program is started, after 5 minutes the connection is enabled, and almost no one is the wiser.

Technicians with partisan fury “fixed” the motors advancing the paper trails in fifteen states. The motors burned out, and the paper trail was never printed.

As more and more states move to touchscreens, more and more democratic victories will be “recorded”. This is the real fifty state strategy.

The mainstream media will do nothing, they would sell their grandmother for a democratic victory.

I may be silenced soon. Get the word out, or we are doomed.

Friday, November 03, 2006

Joe Lieberman, Hat Distributor


Liberals are being handed their hats in Connecticut. There is a long line Joe's "Burned you bad!" Hat Emporium, and shuttle service is included. The destination? Outside the sphere of political influence. There's no coming back soon either.

The vilification of Joe was no where near a friendly debate of ideas. As the liberals stare at the burning bridge called "Rape Gurnery Joe" they cannot bring themselves to admit their own failure.

I never understood it from the start. Lieberman had a safe seat. Only the most deluded knew this would be a close election. Instead of adopting a strategy, like winning, the liberals decided to purge the Democratic party of Joe, at any cost. I would have thought trying to win in Missouri and Connecticut would have been much more effective.

Today I feel so embarrassed for Paul Newman. I saw a Youtube ad with him pitching Lamont.

I guess the liberals care more about being "right" than winning elections. But if that is so, why spend all this time and effort in the election arena?

Monday, October 02, 2006

Take my constitution..........please!


Now that the wholesale dismantling of the Constitution has begun, let's celebrate! Passage of the Torture Law shows the Dems are powerless against W. Soon we will have a one party state, and we can begin hunting Democrats with shotguns. Bambi can live without fear as we purge the earth of these traitors. I've already got my spot picked out!

Sunday, October 01, 2006

Love a Liberal, they need it


Big ole' smooches for The Wizard at Democratic Underground:


The Wizard (423 posts)
Sun Oct-01-06 11:04 AMResponse to Original message
21. A close look at
John Gibson reveals some form of genetic disorder. This is why the Pox (deliberate typo) audience relates to him. Oh great Zeus, answer my prayers and strike them with your lightning.


Don't forget Wiz, we conservatives love you, because you are an American first, and a Liberal second. God Bless, and get well soon.

Wednesday, September 27, 2006

Losing Democratic Tactic #9 - Insult voters



Kos has the actual numbers:

http://www.dailykos.com/storyonly/2006/9/27/104416/472

71 percent of Republicans are too stupid too realize that Bill Clinton hasn't been in office the last six years

Don't get me wrong, I think a majority of liberals are driven by emotion over logic. But I'm not going to be presumptuous to the point of saying X per cent of Dems or Liberals are stupid.

By the way, calling people stupid tends to make them antagonistic to your cause. But maybe you have an election landside in the making, and can afford to lose votes with frivolous insults. Maybe 0.00% of the 71% would ever vote Democratic. Good Luck!

Tuesday, September 26, 2006

Was Harry Truman a Terrorist?



Wasn't Harry responsible for about 100,00 civilian deaths? According to the simplistic, Cindy Sheehanesque definition, Truman was real monster. Or maybe we should use a real live growup definition? Just a question!

Friday, September 22, 2006

Exterminate!


Deploy the Rove-bots against this Kossack. Not only does he use his brain, he understands how the Democrats could gain seats in November. Kos was gloating about how he blew off a chance to get on nationwide TV and talk about Chavez. BradtheDad, reveals his folly.
http://www.dailykos.com/storyonly/2006/9/22/11130/1428

Learning from mistakes (0 / 0)
In his previous post, Markos decried the Democrats inability to learn from previous mistakes, such as basically hoping the national security issue will go away and that Americans really want to hear about the economy.
Yet in this post, he is making a similar mistake. As Charlie Rangel and Nancy Pelosi realize, condemning Hugo Chavez for debasing himself at the UN is a cost-free way to wave the flag. It does not "defend Bush" as some have charged, and even if it does, in this context that is not a bad thing. Staying silent in the face of Chavez's deranged, unhinged rant is tantamount to assent in this case. Believe me, the American people may not like GOP or its policies, but they will not abandon them if the alternative is a party who can be associated with Hugo Chavez.
It's about the symbolism. Markos could have gone on TV and denounced Chavez in no uncertain terms for behavior unbecoming of a head of state, thereby allying the left-leaning blogosphere with the mainstream of American opinion, which holds that whatever one thinks of Bush, certain rhetoric is out of bounds.
Despite the epic screw-ups of the Republicans, Democrats have not gotten enough traction on national security. One of the reasons, I would argue, is that they don't take opportunities like this to reassure Americans that they will vigorously defend America. Sure, it's purely symbolic. But the GOP has been riding the symbols of national security to power for generations now.
by BradtheDad on Fri Sep 22, 2006 at 09:28:04 AM PDT

Thursday, September 21, 2006

Fox News Anniversary

Growing up conservative before FOX news was a pretty lonely trip. I loved reading George Will, and listening to addresses by Reagan. Paul Harvey helped too. Point/Counterpoint was alotta fire, but too short. God Bless Rush for getting things started. I credit him with codifying what I knew subconciously: "Conservatives are logical and pragmatic, Liberals are emotional." What a concept. Conservatives should thank their lucky stars FOX news exists. For some of us it was a long journey through a one-sided wasteland.

Ace has more:http://www.ace.mu.nu/

Tuesday, September 19, 2006

There are no black bloggers in Spanish Harlem


Or so says Bill Clinton:
Bill Clinton's Blogger Rainbow Coalition
– Ace
Why, look at the diversity among liberal NYC bloggers! All races and creeds are represented, from "pale" to "pinkish" to "pasty."

http://dailygotham.com/blog/liza_sabater/there_are_no_black_bloggers_in_harlem_or_new_york_city
I feel a song comin on:

music into...
"There are no black bloggers in Spanish Harlemmm"
"Bloggers are white in Spanish Harlemmmm"
"They don't drive SUVs,
or eat non-PC cheese,
they like to hug the trees,
they get down on their knees,
for non-democracies,"
And beg their pardon................."

Tuesday, September 12, 2006

Buyin' a clue for Bobcat at Democratic Underground



Bobcat, or Hughes, or something, is one confused soul. He heard Bush talking about our enemies on September 11th:

"They," the president said tonight describing our so-called enemies, represent a "totalitarian ideology that hates freedom, rejects tolerance, and despises all dissent." For a brief second, as my gaze shifted away from the television, I had a hard time discerning which regime - theirs or ours - he was talking about.

As a public service to Bob, here are the top ten differences between us and them:

10. Them- mandatory beards, Us - Speedo bathing suits prohibited on males over 40

9. Us - Gas guzzlers, Them - goats

8. Them - Women are totally covered, Us - Honey, cover your midriff, pleasssssee

7. Them - Unemployed, Us - Paid to send email jokes to Aunt Ruth

6. Them - Killed by suicide bombers, Us - Bombed to the gills on Manischewitz, what a wine!

5. Them - Prayin three times a day, Us - Prayin for Friday

4. Them - Trips to Mecca, Us - Trips to the 7-11 for corn dogs

3. Them - Blowin up buildings, Us - Blowing up air mattresses for weekend guests

2. Them - Islam, Us - any old religion, or lack thereof

1. Us - Freedom, Them - a whole buncha stuff, that ain't freedom, and is not alota fun, including hate

Monday, September 11, 2006

The Democratic National Committe desecrates the 9/11 dead





DaNCing on the graves of the 9/11 dead















Our new video highlights the Bush Administration's willingness to use fear and smear tactics to gain political advantage in a tough election year.
www.dnc.org September 11, 2006

Ballons all around! (Don't question their patriotism)

I hate America (Sing it with me)


I hate America
Land of Karl Rove
Let's deride her
And ride her
To the ground
Till Sadam's back in power
Bomb the mountains
Bomb the prairies
Till Al Gore is inaugurated!
I hate America
I love Osama!
And Alec Baldwin, and George Galloway, and Zawahiri, and Kim Jong Il, and Castro

On today of all days. DailyKos just could not give it a rest.
http://www.dailykos.com/storyonly/2006/9/11/91245/2828

Thursday, September 07, 2006

Carebear Alert


HybridFuel does not like Republicans, and posted his/her thoughts on the Democratic National Committee's blog. Does this comment represent mainstream Democratic viewpoint?:

Posted by HybridFuel on September 7, 2006 at 09:41 AM

Points to Consider:
1) Illicit phone calls to women in workplaces to engage in masturbation are good Republican Christian morals.

2) Republican support for Christian polygamy, white slavery, pedophiles, discrimination towards 80-90% of young men in their society and call it religious banishment and teachings.

Group hug for Hybrid!

Headline you won't see anywhere but here


ACLU defends ABC's 9/11 TV Drama

Today, Dorothy M. Ehrlich as Deputy Executive Director of the ACLU announced all resources will be used to sue the DNC, Daily Kos, and Former President Bill Clinton.

"Free speech is under attack as never before. These groups and others and trying to not only limit free speech, but seriously damage the ability of the press to be the free and "fourth" branch of government that makes our country great."

Patti C. Smith, President and General Manager of KVUE-TV could not be happier.

"The bigger the controversy, the bigger the viewing audience. We've doubled the price of commercial time for the program, and we are still having to turn advertisers away!"

Wednesday, September 06, 2006

Why Conservatives love Liberals

Conservatives love Liberals, its true! And as a sweeping generalization Liberals hate Conservatives. Liberals want to see us jailed, beaten, killed, neutered, sterilized, burning in everlasting torment in Hell. Conservatives love Liberals not because we think they are cuddly and cute, (I'm sure some are), but because they are U.S. citizens. If you disrespect a liberal U.S. citizen, you are disrespecting Mom, Apple Pie, Baseball, Nascar, Gun Racks, and the WWF. If you threaten a U.S. liberal citizen, you are threatening all of the above and my hand me down dubble wide. God Bless the Liberals! And fie on anyone who trashes their business in the streets!

Tuesday, September 05, 2006

Dems put the oxy in oxymoron


Or maybe they put the moron in it, I can't tell:

(2) beginning the phased redeployment of U.S. forces from Iraq before the end of this year; (3) working with Iraqi leaders to disarm the militias

Yes they actually put those two side by side. To parapharase Zell: With what are the forces supposed to disarm them, spitballs? How you gonna disarm militias when you been redeployed to say Superman's Fortress of Solitude. Can you just phone it in? Mebbe they need to disarm them before they get redeployed. This makes my head hurt.

Friday, September 01, 2006

Come home Keith, all is forgiven!


But, to date, this government has proved little besides its own arrogance, and its own hubris.
Mr. Rumsfeld is also personally confused, morally or intellectually, about his own standing in this matter. From Iraq to Katrina, to the entire “Fog of Fear” which continues to envelop this nation, he, Mr. Bush, Mr. Cheney, and their cronies have — inadvertently or intentionally — profited and benefited, both personally, and politically.


Keith Olbermann

http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/12131617/#060830b

Dear Keith,
Perfect love casts out fear.
Love,
The GOP

Republicans: The party of Love


Somebody needs a hug:

They don't care about Al Qaeda, they don't care about protecting America - Katrina proved that - they only care about destroying Democrats and Liberals, period. (Democratic Underground)

WI-Gov: Like all Republicans, Green (R) ignores law
by kos
Thu Aug 31, 2006 at 09:37:57 PM PDT
At least we know he's a real Republican.

http://www.dailykos.com/storyonly/2006/9/1/03757/27781

Sadly, it seems, the stupidest trolls on the internet have taken over the Washington Post editorial board. What a bunch of hacks unworthy to even scribble their delusionary nonsense on the Wall Street Journal editorial page. (Atrios)

"Love conquers Hate, believe it!" -Naruto

Thursday, August 31, 2006

Why Conservatives are better than Liberals


Ok, this is a sweeping generalization. And the premise I am about to present is hypothetical. So this post is disqualified on two points already. But if you have watched the interchanges between Conservatives and Liberals(um, Progressives?) over the past 30 years, if you are honest, you will get my point. Especially if you have listened to the discourse since the 2000 U.S. Presidential Election, and you keep your knee from jerking in defense, you might understand.

Here's my third disqualifier Liberals are idiotic fools, another sweeping generalization.

Idiotic because they have let their emotions, hatred for Bush, rule over their brain. Anything that makes Bush look bad is good, anything that makes Bush look good is wrong and a conspiracy. Another thing that fuels their idiocy is the 2000 U.S. Presidential Election. They can't get over it. They wallow in it, and view the future only as it relates to the Election.

So if the stock market goes up, it shows that BushCo is making filthly lucre from the deaths of American soldiers. If the stock market goes down, it shows how incompetent Bush is as an economic leader. The world is suddenly very simple. Bad badness and good goodness. No one has mixed motives. Nothing is complicated. And these people are supposedly the intellectuals.

They are fools because they have let their hatred put them on the wrong side of the Global War On Terror. The terrorists will never surrender, never stop trying to kills up. Perhaps not until this generation has passed away. The fools would rather diminish the GWOT, because Bush is for it, than agree that the terrorists, not Bush, are the true enemy of democracy.

But you have heard this conservative rant many times before. Here's something you might not have heard. Here's why Conservatives are better than Liberals. You see Liberals hate Bush and by extension all Conservatives. We Conservatives are stupid, and evil. Every single one of us. According to Liberals there is a special place in Hell for us. They would have loved if Bill O'Reilly had been one of the Fox people kidnapped in the Middle East.

Still maybe a rant you've heard, so here's the shocker. Conservative love Liberals. We really do. There is no amount a ridicule a Liberal can heap upon us that will destroy that love. If a Conservative soldier is dying in battle, no expression of hatred will diminish his/her love for Liberals.

How could this be, you ask?

When Liberals will dance with glee on the grave of George Bush, why would Conservatives not do the same with say John Kerry.

But it is true, we would not. We love John Kerry.

We are dismayed by many things he does, but we love him.

Why do we love him?

Because Conservatives believe Liberals are also something else.

Conservatives believe John Kerry is a Liberal second.

And an American Citizen, first and foremost.

And Conservatives love American Citizens, first and foremost.

And that's why Conservatives are better than Liberals.

Wednesday, August 30, 2006

Paranoia watch


Thom Hartmann has a silly piece on the ruling by Taylor and developements in the Jonbent case.
http://www.commondreams.org/views06/0829-21.htm
Thom lays it out like this:

It probably took Judge Anna Diggs Taylor around a week to wrap up the wording of her decision, and if the NSA were spying on her without a warrant, the timing of sending off a Boulder agent just in time to generate a sensational headline a week later would be no problem.

Gosh Thom, I know you hate Bush, and can't get over the 2000 Presidential election, but when is your brain gonnna kick in. If Rove was doing anything like what you are talking about, there would be no Air America, you couldn't publish your best sellers, and liberal blogs would be scarcer than hairspray at a Global Warming convention.
Yah Goof.

Thursday, August 24, 2006

Losing Democratic Tactic #7 - Overemphasize your point

The same tired cliches, this time from Kevin Spidel, PDA National Deputy Director:
http://www.pdamerica.org
the hijacking of our Democracy, and the reign of Bush & Company,

Hey, you're progressive (not liberal, that's dirty), we know you don't like Bush and war and his surveillance program. But "hijacking"? If there really was a hijacking the Woodwards and Bersteins would be racking up Pulitzers like crazy. When you talk like that you look silly. The title of this piece is "TAKE BACK THE U.S. HOUSE". Folks ain't gonna help sillies take back the house.

Losing Democratic Tactic #9 - Insult voters

Atrios has a new spin on this:
most of what we think of as "swing voters" are either completely clueless...

And, no, saying people are clueless about politics is not necessarily insulting them.

But don't bother using clear language. Lazily grouping the swing voters in the clueless category is just fine. Doing so inspires them to vote democratic. I'm grateful to Atrios for the grammar update.
Heh.

Wednesday, August 23, 2006

Democratic Underground Litmus Test


DUers must Revere Nance Greggs!
Until today I have never seen anyone criticize her. Here is the nasty comment:

18 Million Purple Thumbs Was Thanks Enough
People everywhere just wanna be free.

http://www.democraticunderground.com/discuss/duboard.php?az=show_mesg&forum=132&topic_id=2793507&mesg_id=2793912
Hmm, I don't think that's so mean. True DUer KiKi jumped on poor Radiophile:

How anyone can read the OP article and then come out with the (____)you're spewing amazes and disgusts me. I would say you should be ashamed, but we all know that Bush supporters have no shame.

enjoy your brief and unappreciated stay.

Ninkasi:
You might benefit from some kind of psychiatric help right now

Nance herself frequently participates in the groupthink comments, but so far is silent to this "criticism"

Remember all DUers must be anti-Iraq war. All DUers must deny anything good happening in Iraq whilst GWB is in office. They will change this policy if a Democrat wins the presidency. Brains and critical thinking are not needed at Democratic Underground.

Tuesday, August 22, 2006

Bad news for Jon Stewart

He might want to get a restraining order against this sick DU child:


jonstewartgirl (16 posts)
Mon Aug-14-06 04:58 PMResponse to Reply #115
131. *prays*
please I hope it was O'Reilly that got kidnapped oh sorry did I say that outloud :p


But I don't question her patriotism

Dream Sequence #2


From Earl at DU:
http://journals.democraticunderground.com/EarlG/71

Joe Lieberman beats Ned Lamont and wins the Senate seat in Connecticut.Early in 2007, Don Rumsfeld quits as Secretary of Defense.George W. Bush offers the job to Lieberman, who accepts.Connecticut's Gov. Jodi Rell (R) appoints a Republican to fill Joe's vacated Senate seat until 2008.Result: George W. Bush gets a "bipartisan" Secretary of Defense, and the Republican party gets a free Senate seat in Connecticut - a seat which they didn't even contest in the 2006 elections.

He says this like its a bad thing!

Friday, August 18, 2006

Things Thomas Jefferson said...

We hold these truths to be self-evident, that all men are created equal, that they are endowed by their Creator with certain unalienable Rights, that among these are Life, Liberty, the pursuit of Happiness, the right to Attack and Overthrow these colonies without the impediment of legal or military opposition, lest they call us bad names and dislike us.

Thursday, August 17, 2006

Kos hypocrisy


http://www.dailykos.com/storyonly/2006/8/17/171747/891
mcjoan from Kos says:
The program's effectiveness is not what we're debating here--at issue is the program's legality, and this federal judge has declared that it is not. It would be just as effective carried out legally under the provisions of FISA.

Now lemme get this straight.
If Bush had carried out this program under the provisions of FISA dailykos would be overflowing with praise and admiration for the great work of the Bush administration?

Yeah right.

You'd be screaming the same things you are screaming now.
Illegal! Unconstitutional! Big Brother!

Just take your win graciously. Don't load it up with liberal hypocrisy.

Losing Democratic Tactic #8 - Savage your own


From listenhillary.org

These folks are anti-war, (I'm guess not Republicans), and anti Hillary. Their chant?

"It takes one bomb to raze a village"

If I was Hillary, I'd be ticked.

If I was the head of the RNC, I'd be happy.

Nancy Pelosi Indictment Watch (Satire)

The calls for Nancy's incarceration are building. On Daily Kos mcjoan lets Pelosi have it with both barrels:
In sum, it is a devastating and categorical rejection of (Nancy Pelosi and) the Bush administration's attempt to overturn our Constitution.
Parenthesis mine

Who knows what she got in exchange for her approval of the program October 1st. It looks like Jesse Jackson is next!

Indict Pelosi Now!


Now that a Federal judge has removed all doubt about Bush's illegal surveillance program, it's time to indict him and his co-conspirators (Cindy Sheehan???). By Peolosi's own admission she is merely "concerned" about the raping of the Bill of Rights:

Dear General Hayden:
During your appearance before the committee on October 1, you indicated that you had been operating since the September 11 attacks with an expansive view of your authorities with respect to the conduct of electronic surveillance under the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act and related statutes, orders, regulations, and guidelines. You seemed to be inviting expressions of concern from us,...

...Until I understand better the legal analysis regarding the sufficiency of the authority which underlies your decision on the appropriate way to proceed on this matter, I will continue to be concerned.
Sincerely,
NANCY PELOSI
Ranking Democrat

I do but jest. But don't look for any criticism of her from the left, it will be a fruitless search

Losing Democratic Tactic #7 - Overemphasize your point


Leahy's spokesman, David Carle, combated the perception that Republicans have kept America safe through their actions in Iraq. "The gross mismanagement of the war in Iraq has handed the terrorists the biggest recruiting and training ground they have ever had, making us less secure than before," he said.

Biggest ever. So big you can see it from plane and satellites. Bush must not want to take it out to keep us terrified. Heh.

I predict when the voter pulls the handle, they will think about whether we had any Post 9/11 attacks on U.S. soil. God willing, there won't be any more.

Losing Democratic Tactic #6 - Ridicule the (Republican) President


"Bush stark raving mad"
http://www.democraticunderground.com/discuss/duboard.php?az=show_mesg&forum=364&topic_id=1927796&mesg_id=1927796

The reason for his madness? Not policy or ideology, but bicycling habits.

This pettiness puts more votes in the R column.

Stuff you won't see on the Daily Kos


"The Nahrawan Irrigation Project In Baghdad Province Was Completed ... The Project Provides Irrigation Water To Farmers In Order To Better Utilize Over 37,000 Acres Of Agricultural Land ..." (U.S. Dept. Of State, "Iraq Weekly Status Report," http://www.state.gov/documents/organization/70365.pdf, 8/9/06)

This is just politics as usual.

I question the timing.

Losing Democratic Tactic #2 - Deny the war on terror


From AuntiePinko at DU:
In the mean time, Levin, take the reportage about terrorist threats with both a healthy cynicism and a healthy respect

Cynicism and respect? Can you say oxymoron? Hmm, maybe there's a per centage thing going on here. 60% cynicism, is that progressive enough? Please publish the correct liberal ratio. Do I wait to take action when actual pieces of concrete have gone beyond bruising my body and are breaking the skin?

Is cynicism recommended for "terror" attacks? What's the recommended cynicism level for "9/11"?

But don't worry, if you get blown up because of your authorized cynicism, AuntiePinko will... will....

Oh, I guess you are outta luck.

Auntie Pinko won't take responsibility for her bad advice.

She'll blame Bush.

Wednesday, August 16, 2006

Losing Democratic Tactic #5 - Run as the "Party of Death"

From the NYT:
Mr. Schiavo flew to Connecticut last month to help Ned Lamont, who defeated Senator Joseph I. Lieberman in the Democratic primary.

What's next? Campaign ads with Kevorkian popping Mentos? Creepy.

Dream Sequence #1


Joe Liberman wins the 2006 Connecticut Senatorial contest as an independent. Once in office, Joe changes his party affiliation back to Democrat. Joe then gains support from the moderate Democrats, and wins the nomination as the 2008 Democratic Presidential candidate.

One month later the following exchange is heard at the office water cooler:
"Have you been to Kos lately?"
"Naw, what's the point."

Losing Democratic Tactic #4 - Run against (blank), not for something.


http://www.mydd.com/story/2006/8/15/133831/421 Matt Stoller at mydd has got it all twisted around. He's mad because people are saying the Democrats have no message. Then he goes on to lay out the great Contract with America. No, wait that was the Republicans, they fufilled their contract when a Democrat held the presidency. Anyway, he's says Bush is in charge, and infers that the Democrats would take control of congress, and do nothing but stop Bush from "screwing things up more." I love that slogan. "Put us in charge, we have almost no power!"

Tuesday, August 15, 2006

Losing Democratic Tactic #2 - Deny the war on terror


"[T]he war on terror cannot be won." (George Soros, Op-Ed, "A Self-Defeating War," The Wall Street Journal, 8/15/06)

Please turn out in huge numbers and vote for the "can't win" party. Now there is inspiration.

Losing Democratic Tactic #3 - Label Republicans as racist


For that matter, BobcatJH labels the whole U.S.A. as racist on DU

A nation of George Allens

Hey, everyone, did you hear? A Republican put his foot in his mouth, coming out of the closet as the racist most had suspected him to be.


...his actions only represent the latest in a long line of examples of life in Republican America.

Is Bobcat coming out of the closet as well?

Losing Democratic Tactic #2 - Deny the war on terror


Nancy Greggs From Democratic Underground:

Over the past few weeks, I keep hearing Republicans saying that it’s important for all of us, especially voters, to understand who is taking the War on Terror seriously, and who is not. Well, put me in the ‘not’ column. Actually, put me in the ‘not a snowball’s chance in hell I’m taking this seriously’ column.

This is not a parody. I've read many of Nancy's columns, and I have never seen anyone disagree with her.
Wow.

Culture of Corruption vs Weak on Terror





In the Slogan fight for 2006 congressional election, the edge goes to the Republicans. Average Joe can live with a little money being exchanged under the table. Average Joe can't live when he's, uh, dead.

Monday, August 14, 2006

Losing Democratic Tactic #1 - Mock the war on terror

Kossack SusanG contributes to the Republican 2006 Congressional effort

While we're at it, confiscate phones, all of them. Landlines, cells ... whatever. Shut down the internet.

This worked so well in 2004, 2002. Stay with what works.

Sunday, August 13, 2006

Howard Dean "Tough, Smart"


Howard said he's smart. After telling us that a Democratically controlled government can fight an effective war on terror, make the middle class economically "safe", give money to kids, to go to college, build perpetual motion engines, and create a cool new planet in our solar system. I hope he is the only person left that thinks any government can give, and do, all things to all people. But then maybe he doesn't care about truth. Us grownups remember hearing this bunk from Jimmy Carter. I will give him one thing, he talked like he was absolutely convinced what he was saying was true.

Friday, August 11, 2006

Global Testing! (Is this thing on?)


The problem with the pure diplomacy route? You have to:
1) Implore the murderers to be nice.
2) Endure their attacks with stoicism ("This is the better way in the long run.")
3) Wait for the current generation to die, because they will never respect, understand, or stop killing us. ("15 years of bloodshed for a 1000 years of peace is worth it!)
4) Contiunously whisper Godot's Prayer:

"Dear Energy Force,
Please let the children of the murderers disregard the indoctrination of their parents. Make them like us.

Wednesday, February 22, 2006

Call to WW II Generation

http://www.thecrimson.com/article.aspx?ref=511457

I'm sending out a plea to the World War Two generation. Remember Pear Harbor. I will cut a tiny bit of slack to the baby boomers. They did not see Neville Chamberlain declare "peace in our time." They did not see our late entry making the war longer, and costing more human lives. WWII folks please remember. Remind us we must stand together against enemies of freedom. The Allies can be victorius again.

Monday, January 30, 2006

Cindy vs Feinstein

http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20060128/ap_on_el_se/sheehan_senate

I hope she runs and wins. Then she would get a taste of the real world, and have all the political clout of say, Dennis Kucinich.